Pulled out my tailight stock for a 1969 FLH I’m restoring and I noticed a couple were Guide 55 and one was a guide 68 with the only external difference being the identifying stamping. Is the Guide 68 the correct one to use?
Pulled out my tailight stock for a 1969 FLH I’m restoring and I noticed a couple were Guide 55 and one was a guide 68 with the only external difference being the identifying stamping. Is the Guide 68 the correct one to use?
I believe the stamping on the body should have the 68 number on it, but the red lens for that year and later is tall, whereas the earlier red lens is flat.
The bulb holder varies between the two lamps. Either one will bolt to the fender, but you want the one stamped 68.
VPH-D
The Guide 68 is the correct shell for your 1969. I believe 1969 was the first year it was used.
As stated above, the taillight socket mounts differently inside the shell. You should also have the "projection" clear outlook lens that extends above the shell, and the red tail light lens that sticks out beyond the shell in the back to make room for the bulb in it's new mounting position.
Federal law was changed and required that brake and tail lights be visible from the side so the -68 tail light has lenses that protrude slightly from the housing.
Jerry
The red tail light lens is actually a -69 part (68090-69). The parts manual shows the entire assembly (including the Guide 68 shell) to be a 1969 model year change, and I believe this to be true. I have a very late production original paint 1968 XLCH and it still has the Guide 55 tail light assembly. As Jerry W. mentioned above, it was all part of the 1969 federal law change that required the side reflectors to be added as well.
My 69 has the -55 light. I don't believe the updated part was used throughout the model year.
It would be nice to hear from the owners of original paint machines
Ralph