Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Correct fork for 1946 ?

  1. #1

    Default Correct fork for 1946 ?

    I have an early 1946 bullneck frame. It's unclear to me what would be the correct fork to use with this frame. I have heard it would still be the inline style. Can anyone give some insight? Thanks,
    Eric
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
    Eric MATHIEU @ Beauty of Speed
    www.beautyofspeed.com
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    294

    Default

    I have seen 2 very original 46 OHV's with Bullnecks and Inline Forks over the last 2 years. 46EL

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern Colorado
    Posts
    443

    Default

    Palmer states the bullneck/inline fork combination was used for approximately 18 to 22 weeks of production.
    VPH-D

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Menomonie, WI
    Posts
    596

    Default

    VPH-D

    I do not believe that bullneck/inline fork production in 1946 could be anywhere near "18 to 22 weeks". That is almost half of all 1946 production time. In 30 years of looking at 1946's and trying to answer this question, I have only seen 3 to 4 original bikes with this configuration. Usually the serial number of such a bike is in the 3900 to 4200 range.

    The 29 degree/inline bikes seem to be 1000 to 3900 and the bullneck/offset fork seem to be 4200+. My opinion is that bullneck/inline fork production was a mere transition period and not extended production.

    Jerry

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    NOR CAL & MID WEST
    Posts
    28

    Default

    I was on a cruise once and there were soooooo many forks I just started with the middle one with a "Jethrow Grip"

  6. #6

    Default

    Hi, I had an early frame, inline- 46, was 37xx s/n Also had a bullneck, offset- 46, was 44xx s/n
    from what, I have looked at in the last 20 years, I agree with Jerrys information
    LJH

  7. #7

    Default

    Ok so from what I'm getting most 46 bullneck bikes would run offset forks. Thanks for the info,
    Eric
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
    Eric MATHIEU @ Beauty of Speed
    www.beautyofspeed.com
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    104

    Default

    In your original post, you state that you have an "early" bullneck frame. If the frame is an early '46 with a 29 degree rake (often called a bullneck), it has to run an inline springer. The true 30 degree bullneck frames used an inline springer for a few months of production, and then went to the offset springer. Make sure you are correctly identifying your frame as a true 30 degree bullneck.

    I just found a picture of a very original looking bike, 46FL49xx, with a bullneck frame and inline springer. Incidently, it has narrow brace fenders, early rocker boxes, and the early flat foot clutch rocker peday.
    Last edited by knuckleheadtim; 10-16-2011 at 05:05 PM. Reason: Adding information.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    North Hills, CA and Pine Grove, CA
    Posts
    4,284

    Default

    Here is a factory photo of 46FL1080. It clearly shows the inline fork. I have another photo of a 1946 in the 4000 range that has offset fork.
    Be sure to visit;
    http://www.vintageamericanmotorcycles.com/main.php
    Be sure to register at the site so you can see large images.
    Also be sure to visit http://www.caimag.com/forum/

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern Colorado
    Posts
    443

    Default

    Chris, isn't that bike a WL?
    Jerry, just parroting what I have read. I'm not as familiar as some of you guys with Knuck nuances.
    What casting number fork would be correct for a 45FL?
    Thanks,
    VPH-D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •