Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 52

Thread: Poll: Value of Restored vs. Original Condition Bikes?

  1. #31
    Ohio-Rider Guest

    Default

    exeric..... I agree completely. Well stated. Thanks....Steve

  2. #32
    miker Guest

    Default

    I decide to fully restore my 35 vld ( picture in Hello under post practice) but the "period modified "bike was too far gone mechanically...

    All the pieces were there, so we decided to go "all in". I hope it does well in showing and rides as good as it looks, because riding it is why I did it. I sure would love a Originl Paint bike though! I hope there aren't oo many for sale in Davenport this weekend.

    Miker

  3. #33
    HarleyCreation Guest

    Default

    Thanks for your opinions and viewpoints.

    In the "antique" bike realm there is apparantly no hard and fast rules like there are in the gun collecting world. For antique firearms original-original-original condition is everything.

    The world of "old" bikes is vastly different it seems depending on ones viewpoint. Nothing appears to be written in stone and like somebody said, the marketplace is defining value for us.

    Maybe the marketplace is the only standard for "old" bikes in 2007, whether they be authentically original, new/shiny restoration, older restoration, forced patina, or replica bike.

  4. #34
    miker Guest

    Default Poll: Value of Restored vs. Original Condition Bikes?

    I guess it is in the eye of the beholder.
    I am not sure about the forced patina issue, something seems too phoney to me and I imagine the unscroupulous will have an advantage of the uneducated, it however, just my opionin.

    Repro bikes serve a purpose to the owner and I surely would not mind a repop Indian.

    Restored or better yet rustored bikes, to me, appear to be the best of both worlds. I tried to keep as much of the original equipment on mine and had some minor deductions during Judging to prove it ;-)...It now rides as good as it looks.

    Miker

  5. #35
    jurassic Guest

    Default 1913

    so heres a question.you have an older restoration,someone has painted everything,rather poorly.but none of the nickel was touched.the engine is totally original and runs like a watch.the hubs and even the spokes are original patina.obviously this was a nice original paint bike,but only half its soul has been destroyed. so in order to "preserve history" what is the best course of action to take?should i spend 20 grand ,and over a year to blast away the final remnants of this survivor?only to have it disappear into a sea of "shiny gray fellows" .and never get noticed again,and probably be called a repop anyways.

  6. #36
    c.o. Guest

    Default

    Wow that's a toughy and I'm sure your going to get a whole slew of different opinions on that one. I'd say either leave it or do a match up on the tin with the rest of the bikes patina ?????? It doesn't really matter anyway....when your all finished someone's going to tell you that you should have done it another way. Your damned if you don't and damned if you do. Either way, cool bike and I'm sure it'll turn out allright. Oh, by the way I stopped in at your shop on the way to Davenport, but you'd already left. Very cool facility and awesome machines! I was particularily interested in the strap tanks.........Great stuff!!!

  7. #37
    bmh Guest

    Default

    I would personally leave as is. From the photo the original parts look pretty good andthe paint , while obviously re done doesn't look like a bad job either, and like it or not , the repaint is part of the machines history. So I guess we still have the same question. To preserve history or to recreate it? And everyone asked will have their own answer .... and thats OK. Whatever you decide is fine as long as it is right for you. Bye the way very nice machine.
    Brian

  8. #38
    silentgreyfello Guest

    Default

    I would go with the "patina" paint job. The paint looks tacky the way it is and like you mentioned, would look out of place if you repainted it without restoring the rest of the bike. I had a similar dilema on my '14 racer... original tanks painted red, some new parts, some old parts, engine completely overhauled but not cosmetically restored. I didn't want a pound of bondo in the tanks, nor did I want to buy repro tanks with solid original ones, so patina job it was. It will be on ebay later this week to fund other projects. Everyone has a different opinion so do what suits you.

  9. #39
    Kojack Guest

    Default

    I wonder if someone who does soda blasting could remove the new paint and leave what's underneath intact?

  10. #40
    miker Guest

    Default Re: 1913

    Originally posted by jurassic
    so heres a question.you have an older restoration,someone has painted everything,rather poorly.but none of the nickel was touched.the engine is totally original and runs like a watch.the hubs and even the spokes are original patina.obviously this was a nice original paint bike,but only half its soul has been destroyed. so in order to "preserve history" what is the best course of action to take?should i spend 20 grand ,and over a year to blast away the final remnants of this survivor?only to have it disappear into a sea of "shiny gray fellows" .and never get noticed again,and probably be called a repop anyways.
    Wow, I did not give that much thought...What a quandry...I guess the patina artist could restore the bike to match its wheels n hubs...I see your point about as shiny new bike too...Search deep and make the decision right for you...soda blasting may reveal something...I used 3m safe stripper over several months to reach the oem color but it too was damaged. Best of luck whatever you decide.

    Miker

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •